Comparing WS2. 01. Mompov 28 Year. R2 Hyper V and v. Sphere 5. 1. Bring on the hate  which gets ahemmoderated but those v. Fanboys will attempt to post anyway. Matt Mc. Spirit of Microsoft did his now regular comparison of the latest versions of Microsoft Windows Server 2. R2 Hyper V and VMware v. Sphere 5. 1 at Tech. Ed NA 2. 01. 3 original video deck here. Here are my notes on the session, where I contrast the features of Microsofts and VMwares hypervisors. Before we get going, remember that the free Hyper V Server 2. R2, Windows Server Standard, and Windows Server Datacenter all have the exact same Hyper V, Failover Clustering, and storage client functionality. And you license your Windows VMs on a per host basis and thats that same on Hyper V, VMware, Xen. Server, etc.   Therefore, if you run Windows VMs, you have the right to run Hyper V on StdDC editions, and therefore Hyper V is always free. Dont bother BSing me with contradictions to the Hyper V is free fact if you disagree then send me your employers name and address so I can call the Business Software Alliance to make an easy 1. Scalability. Most of the time this information is just Top Gear numbers. Do I need a 1. Search for featured resources by category or subject area. Cisco WebEx Meeting Center integrated with InterCall OnDemand Audio conferencing and VoIP empower your global workforce to gather as though facetoface. Learn software, creative, and business skills to achieve your personal and professional goals. Join today to get access to thousands of courses. As we use a multivendor network in my company mainly Cisco and Juniper, I use Unetlab for modeling and some basic tests no VPLSEVPN dataplane on XRv, sadly I. Last week, news broke a network of fake Russian trolls bought at least 100,000 in ads from Facebook between June 2015 and May 2017. The ads were sometimes. PCWorld scanned the entire universe of technology this yearHDTVs, phones, tablets, PCs, ebook readers, storage, software, services, apps, digital. Tabtight professional, free when you need it, VPN service. BHP car that can accelerate to 1. MPH in 4 seconds  Nope, but its still nice to know that the muscle is there if I need it. Microsoft agrees, so they havent done any work on this basic figures to extend maximum capacities from where they are with WS2. One of the things that I am called upon to do fairly often in my current role is to configure remote access VPN devices for some site or another. Fi1ZOs/UKQ4qOytFII/AAAAAAAABnA/kSZaKblcO_k/s1600/ii+manager.png' alt='Cisco Network Magic Pro 5 5' title='Cisco Network Magic Pro 5 5' />CiscoICND2. G9TC5zA/UZ-hCQaXsnI/AAAAAAAACz0/pnvGDQvUzw0/s1600/ci2.png' alt='Cisco Network Magic Pro 5 5' title='Cisco Network Magic Pro 5 5' />Hyper V. The focus instead is on cloud, efficiency, and manageability. Historical Romance Novels Pdf. But here you go anyway If you want to compare like with like, then the free Hyper V crushes the free v. Sphere hypervisor in every way, shape, and form. The max VM numbers per host are a bit of a stretch. But interestingly, I did encounter someone last year in London who would have used the maximum VM configuration. Network Magic provides doityourself tools to help you set up, manage and secure your network, but is it really as pointandclick easy as it sounds Get our full. Storage. Storage is the most expensive piece of the infrastructure and that has had a lot of focus from Microsoft over the past 2 releases WS2. WS2. 01. 2 R2.   In the physical world, WS2. Live Migration.   MPIO is possible using the SAN vendors own solution in the guest OS of the VM. In the v. Sphere world, MPIO is only available to the most expensive versions of v. Sphere.   VMware still does not support native 4 K sector disks. That eliminates new storage from being used, and limits them to the slow RMW process for 5. E disks. In the VM space, Microsoft dominates. WS2. R2 allows complete resizing of VHDX attached to SCSI controllers remember that Gen 2 VMs only use SCSI controllers, and data disks should always be on a SCSI controller in Gen 1 VMs. In the v. Sphere world, you can grow your storage, but that cloud customer doesnt get elasticity no shrink Im afraid so keep on paying for that storage that you temporarily used VHDX scales out to 6. TB.   Meanwhile, VMware are stuck in the 1. TB VMDK file.   I hate passthrough disks raw device mapping so Im not even bothering to mention that Microsoft wins there too oh wait I just did ODX is supported in all versions of Hyper V thats the way Hyper V rolls but youll only get that support in the 2 most expensive versions of v. Sphere.   Thatll slow down your cloud deployments, e. VMM 2. 01. 2 R2 will deploy VMsServices from a library via ODX and we can nearly instantly create zeroed out fixed VHDX files on ODX enabled storage. Both platforms support boot from USB. To be fair, this is only supported by MSFT if it is done using Hyper V Server by an OEM. No OEM offers this option that I know of. And VMware does offer boot from SD which is offered by OEMs. VMware wins that minor one. When you look at file based storage, SMB 3. NFS, then Microsofts Storage Spaces crushes not just VMware, but the block storage market too. Tiered storage is added in WS2. R2 for read performance hot spots promoted to SSD and write through performance Write Back Cache where data is written temporarily to SSD during write activity spikes. Memory. The biggest work a vendor can do on hypervisor efficiency is in memory, because host RAM is normally the first bottleneck to VM host density. VMware offers Memory overcommit closest to Hyper V Dynamic Memory as you can get. However, DM does not overcommit overcommitting forces hosts to do second level paging. That requires fast disk and reduces VM performance. Thats why Hyper V focuses on assigning memory based on demand without lying to the guest OS, and why DM does not overcommit. Compression Swapping Transparent Page Sharing TPS This deduping is not in Hyper V. I wonder how useful this is when the guest OS is Windows 8Server 2. Randomization and large page tables make render this feature pretty useless. This deduping also requires CPU effort 4. K page deduping and it only occurs when host memory is under pressure. Hyper V does do Resource Metering, and presents that data into System Center Windows Azure Pack and Operations Manager. VMware does make the data more readily available in a simpler virtualization versus cloud installation via v. Center.   v. Sphere free does not present this data because there is no v. Center, whereas that data is gathered and available in all versions of Hyper V. Network Qo. S is a key piece in the converged networks story of Hyper V, in all editions. Youll need the most expensive edition of v. Sphere to do Network Qo. S. Before the v. Fanboys get all fired up, WS2. R2 all editions of Hyper V adds Storage Qo. S, configurable on a per virtual hard disk basis. Sphere Enterprise Plus is required for Storage Qo. S.   Cha ching Security Multi tenancy. Hyper V is designed from the network up for multi tenancy and tenant isolation Extensible virtual switch add not replace as with v. Sphere v. Switch 3rd party functionality more than 1 if you want to the Hyper V virtual switch Hyper V Network Virtualization HNV aka Software Defined Networking aka SDN to be fair it requires VMM 2. R2 to be used in production Dont give me guff about number of partners WS2. Hyper V had more network extension partners at RTM time than v. Sphere did after years of support for replacing their v. Switch. So, we keep the Hyper V virtual switch and all of its functionality such as Qo. S and HNV if we add 3rd party network functionality, e. Cisco Nexus 1. 00. Hyper V.   On the other hand, the v. Sphere v. Switch is thrown out if you add 3rd party network functionality, e. Cisco Nexus 1. 00. Sphere. The number of partner extensions for Hyper V shown above is actually out of date its higher now. I also think that the VMware number is now 3 Id heard something about IBM adding a product. Im not going line by line with this one. Long story short on cloudsecurity networking All versions of Hyper V yes v. Sphere free no or very restricted v. Sphere pay up for add ons andor the most expensive edition of v. Sphere Networking Performance. Lots of asterisks for VMware on this one DVMQ automatically and elastically scales acceleration and hardware offload of inbound traffic to VMs beyond core 0 on the host. Stereolithography File Viewer. Meanwhile in VMware land, youre bottlenecked to core 0. On a related note, WS2. R2 leverages DVMQ on the host to give us VRSS virtual receive side scaling in the guest OS. That allows VMs to elastically scale processing of inbound traffic beyond just v. CPU 0 in the guest OS.